Wait, is this a real life story or a fictional one?
That being said, I am of the opinion that taking a life is always wrong. I’m a pacifist, so there’s that influencing my answer, but it doesn’t matter to me if the government authorizes it. Lots of governments have authorized horrific things throughout history. I consider gov’t people who condemn criminals to death no different than outlaw murderers. So for cases wherein people are sentenced to death, someone is carrying out the sentences, guards are complicit in it, lawyers, juries, judges, etc.
I think what would matter is not the label of what the person is. I think what matters is acknowledging that a life has been taken and that is horrible, no matter how awful or wonderful the victim might have been. They took a human life, no matter what, and that is wrong. They are, however, still a person themselves.
That being said, context like, does matter, and I think the focus
shouldn’t be on “you’re murderer so you’re not worth anything!” but
instead on understanding the crime and the perpetrator no matter their
role, and then on rehabilitation. The context of course matters a lot in terms of rehabilitation/their ability to understand what they’ve done. So that can’t be discounted.



