❤ Favorite Male: Koichi or Knuckleduster ❤ Favorite Female: Pop ❤ Favorite Pairing: Pop/Koichi ✖ Least Favorite Character: Shoko ✔ who’s most like me: Koichi ❤ most attractive: Tensei ❤ three more characters that I like: Tensei, Knuckleduster, Kuin
YUP. Did you also noticed how when Historia starts to reconsider what her father is asking her to do–before the Ymir flashbacks even start–the music that plays is the same as played when Ymir made her decision at Utgard and jumped off to save Historia? I got chills and was like shrieking. Lol.
It’s so refreshing to see a nonsexualized and yet unambiguous lesbian relationship in media. Too often it’s used to titillate male audiences and I’m relieved to see how beautiful their relationship is, how unambiguous it is, how important to the overall story, and yet how it’s never designed to tease or titillate the audience.
Hi Anon! I understand. I think both of those are valid responses of the cast to their predicaments. And I agree; I think most of the cast is focused on their mission–and many of them are dying anyways 😦
That being said, it’s interesting to me (and I know this isn’t what you were saying but it’s something I see a lot of! So if it’s okay I kinda want to touch on it a bit?) that a lot of people are like “romance isn’t a thing in SnK!” It’s definitely not a defining characteristic (and it should not ever be), but we definitely have quite a few directly stated canonical feelings. We have for sure:
Jean–>Mikasa
Falco–>Gabi
Mikasa–>Eren
Ymir<–>Historia
Petra–>Levi
Bertolt–>Annie
Hitch–>Marlowe
Franz<–>Hannah
And you could argue for Connie and Sasha as well. There are others that are ambiguous too. I’m not saying this because of shipping reasons either (I don’t ship several of these and one’s even a NOTP but they’re unambiguous in the text). Even among the ones I think are ambiguous (which I’m not mentioning here) I don’t ship some of them, but I still think they’re canonically ambiguous.
If you introduce a romantic feeling that is unambiguous the logical thing is for that to result in payoff, aka have some affect on the narrative (even minor characters like Franz and Hannah’s deaths established the tragedy and horror of the battle they faced, Marlowe thought of Hitch when dying, Levi grieved his squad which established his character, Bertolt’s for Annie had the least narrative significance because I think his arc in general wasn’t as well done as it should have been but it still can be seen as affecting his decisions in Shiganshina). They aren’t there “just ‘cause” or that’s just stupid writing. That’s why I’ve been saying I would expect some kind of acknowledgement for Eremika, and for Galco, and for Jean’s feelings to get some kind of mention again. Yumikuri is a defining part of Historia’s arc, as the anime reinforced with the latest episode, and as we can see with Historia’s current predicament, she is still affected by the loss of Ymir, and their relationship establishes a lot of the themes of the entire story.
SnK is not a romance manga, no, and won’t ever and shouldn’t ever be a defining mover in the story. But, romantic love isn’t something that doesn’t matter at all to the story, either.
So what’s interesting about Monoma is that as much of a fool as he makes himself out to be…
…he’s actually quite the smart guy.
If stats are to be believed, more intelligent than Midoriya, even (Midoriya is 4/5!). Let’s not forget he was able to see through Ochako’s plan during her duel with Bakugou in the sports festival and was the strategist for his own team during the cavalry battle.
It’s been remarked that Midoriya’s use of One For All resembled a child’s in its lack of control and side effects to its user. It only makes sense that a child would be unable to control their quirk, but grow up to refine their power.
It makes it all the more impressive that Monoma’s able to use quirks at a skill level in which they don’t harm him, given that the people he’s copying from have had, on average, a decade of getting used to them.
This likely means that his observational and analytical skills are on par with and probably even exceed Midoriya’s. I’d even go as far as to say he might be even bigger a hero otaku than Midoriya himself, as a good way to offset his lack of experience with each quirk would be to be highly knowledgeable in a variety of them, much like Momo needs to know about chemistry to use her own quirk.
Can Monoma copy One For All, though?
I’m inclined to believe he can’t, for two reasons:
The first one is very straightforward. According to All Might, a condition for passing down All For One is that the bearer must wish for it to be so. Copying might not be exactly passing down, but the condition might still make it impossible for it to happen.
The second one is more complicated and has to do with the quirk factor. We know that Eri’s quirk, Rewind, works by rewinding an individual’s body to a prior state. Aizawa states that the drug created by the Eight Precepts of Death attacks the quirk factor, and since he also seems to believe that Toogata’s quirk can be restored by rewinding, we can presume he’s working under the assumption that Toogata still has a quirk, and that his quirk factor is still there and has just been damaged beyond repair. If Eri were able to refine Rewind enough to target it specifically at Toogata’s quirk factor, restoring it should not be much different than healing Midoriya’s wounds, which she has been shown to be capable of doing already.
Now, let’s analyze how Erasure, Aizawa’s quirk, works.
Erasure only temporarily halts the activation of the quirk factor without damaging it. The example used to explain it is a human with a moveable tail. Erasing the quirk factor doesn’t remove the tail, just the capability to use it beyond what a normal human could. As per his example, tail – quirk; moving the tail – dependent on quirk factor. Just like the quirk-destroying drug, Aizawa’s Erasure targets the quirk factor, not the quirk itself. Quite different from All For One, who was shown to be able to target the quirk itself. This means someone like Ragdoll might have their quirk factor intact, but no quirk to use it with, and thus a rewind might not be effective in returning their quirk.
My point is: it is possible that a quirk and quirk factor exist independently from each other. That would mean that what is perceived as “quirklessness” could be a result of not having a quirk, but it could also be a result of not having a quirk factor (as it could be both). While Aizawa can erase One For All, meaning that it has its own quirk factor, One For All does not override or merge with the original constitution of its bearer – otherwise when handing it down, a bearer with a quirk would let go of the quirk factor as well, rendering their quirk unusable, and we know that not to be true through Nana.
Assuming all of this is true, there are three results arising from six scenarios:
Midoriya does not have a quirk, but does have a quirk factor.
Result: Monoma can’t copy it.
One For All’s conditions impede copying it.
Result: Monoma can’t copy it.
Midoriya does not have a quirk or quick factor.
Result: Monoma can’t copy it.
Midoriya does have a quirk, but not a quirk factor, thus rendering it unusable.
Result: Monoma can copy it, but it might be a different quirk than the one we’re expecting – meaning, he would be able to attract objects like Midoriya’s mother, breathe fire like his father, manifest a combination of both, or manifest a variation of either.
Monoma can copy One For All despite it being the secondary quirk, just like Aizawa can erase it.
Result: I’m wrong about all of the above or it doesn’t apply and can only wait to see what happens. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
See point 1, but Monoma can still copy it because what Copy does is simply seeking an active quirk.
Result: See above. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
The title says I talk about three topics and I’ve only covered one and a half, so let’s move to the second part of this…
Shinsou
Here’s the thing: I find the possibility of Monoma not copying One For All just as interesting as him copying it. I think most people are rooting on Monoma doing so and there are probably theories flying around regarding what would happen if he does, so I won’t delve into that.
Monoma being unable to copy One For All, either because Midoriya doesn’t have a quirk or because the copied quirk is a different one, are both excellent segues into learning about the nature of quirks themselves, instead of having the focus always be exclusively on One For All. The story needs it, too, if it is ever going to go back to Toogata and Ragdoll.
So, how does Shinsou tie back into all of this?
The person most familiar with Copy’s intrincancies is Monoma himself, and as a member of Shinsou’s team, they’d probably have to familiarize each other with the other’s quirks.
Monoma’s failure to copy One For All, which is the only quirk of Midoriya’s that anyone knows, would alert everyone as to the strange nature of this quirk. Not only would it be immediately obvious to Monoma, but also to anyone else who knows how Copy operates. Cue Shinsou.
Shinsou was already witness to the strange workings of One For All when Midoriya managed to break free from Brainwashing during their duel at the sports festival. Suspicious, but one time could simply be his own fluke.
A second instance of Midoriya’s quirk acting differently than expected would only serve as confirmation that the issue is with Midoriya himself.
Midoriya seems to believe Shinsou’s Brainwashing – the instance in which he lost control of his own body – may have been the trigger for him seeing the vestiges of One For All, something All Might never experienced himself. There’s a chance Shinsou wouldn’t get a chance to brainwash Midoriya during the training, but Midoriya is probably curious about it, and if Shinsou shares any degree of that interest…
Well, they could kill two birds with one stone.
Addendum: I just remembered, but Shinsou is the one who rags on Midoriya for being blessed the kind of quirk he has and all that, so it just makes it even more narratively perfect if Shinsou can be one of the few to find out the nature of One For All.
I’d have to reread, but I don’t remember anything explicit in the text indicating that Levi had feelings for Petra, though it’s certainly possible! He definitely loved her like he loved all his squad (a defining part of Levi’s character is his deep care for his loved ones even if he’s a tsundere about it) but while Petra did apparently have romantic feelings for him according to her dad, I don’t recall anything that hinted at Levi reciprocating those feelings. But nothing really indicates that he didn’t, either, so it’s up to any reader to decide! If you like it I suggest writing AUs for it :’‘‘)
Original Release Date: September 7th, 2018 Retail Price: 620 Yen
Isayama Hajime’s Kodansha Editor, Kawakubo Shintaro, has released the cover of Bessatsu Shonen’s September 2018 issue, featuring anime versions of Eren, Jean, Mikasa, Reiner, Armin, and Historia in Isayama Hajime’s SnK High School AU! This issue will contain SnK Chapter 109, and a clear file featuring the cover illustration will also be included with the issue.
Bessatsu Shonen’s most recent previous SnK covers were the May 2018 and September 2018 issues.
Update: As noticed by sim0n2170 on Reddit, the cover is a direct parody of the movie poster for John Hughes’ iconic film The Breakfast Club.
This is the best thing I’ve ever seen (The Breakfast Club is my favorite movie of all time).
It depends. I am a fast reader and prefer reading to watching generally. That being said I have a job, writing obligations besides that, I try to do things with friends/family, and a chronic illness. So. Some days I can get through quite a lot and other days I’m lucky to get out of bed. 😛 Sorry for a non-answer!