Sorry if I am wrong but I remember you saying that Harry’s attitude towards Snape towards the end of the series wasn’t realistic. Was it not realistic because it didn’t suit Harry’s character and his personality or is it just Snape didn’t do enough to redeem himself. I have seen opinion that narrative treated Snape too much like a hero. Do you agree with it?

I actually don’t think it’s unrealistic!! So I don’t think I ever meant to say that. I do think it is idealistic though and would be unusual in reality—but it’s a fairy tale so I think it fit perfectly with Harry Potter’s framing as a series. I wouldn’t change it for anything, and I actually do think it fits Harry’s character and the themes bound up in it: namely, loss and grief, and learning to be wrong. Harry was seldom wrong about his hunches and he didn’t take people doubting him very well either (it led to conflict multiple times) but he was very wrong about Snape and not only acknowledged that but chose to honor him. I think that’s a beautiful resolution personally.

Which is your favourite book series?

My favorite manga, novel, or book series specifically? 

Manga: HxH and Monster by Urasawa.

Novel: Dostoyevsky’s Demons and/or Crime and Punishment

Series specifically: honorary shout out to Mistborn, but Harry Potter is my favorite series. It’s such a magical series for me. I was banned from reading it as a child because fundamentalist religion, but read it right after finishing college (in the month before I moved to India where I worked at a boarding school, so the context was super appropriate lol). Since then I’ve reread the entire series every December, because I associate it with Christmas as a result. I love it and it met me at a point in my life where I really needed a series with its themes. I even love Cursed Child (which came out a couple years later) though I know it’s not like, flawless. The movies are okay, but I love the books so much. They’re not perfect and there are issues specifically with representation, but I still love them so much and they are perfect for me. 

What do you think of Harry naming his son after Snape?

Well, Snape’s my favorite character in Harry Potter. I think it’s a bit… weird because he was a bully even though he was also a brave man. Like nothing Harry says about him is wrong, but he also still was a terrible bully to Harry and to others like Hermione. (Teachers like him do exist also.) I believe Rowling has even stated this in interviews.

But, tbh, people who throw fits over it I want to force to attend Fairytales 101. Harry Potter is, indeed, a very long fairytale. Of course it has an idealistic ending instead of a gritty one in which Harry does not want to forgive Snape or holds a more realistic, gray opinion of him. It’s an ending that, while saccharine, is very fitting for its genre, and I have few if any complaints about it. Like, honestly, I don’t care if an ending is happy or tragic if it fits the genre and the story’s characters and themes as they’ve been established. Harry Potter’s ending is one of those that, while very happy, I feel fits, even with the name thing. 

From a realistic perspective, we could analyze which is worse: Snape, who actually does express concern about Harry being left at the Dursley’s but bullies Harry actively, or Dumbledore, who is kind to Harry but willingly left him in an abusive situation (I know, I know, magic via blood and families, but like still). Both of them are framed as gray by the last book, and while Harry probably would never love Snape, he respected him in the end. Is it realistic? No, I don’t think so. Does that matter? Also no, not for me, because it’s a fairytale. 

Harry Potter

  • Character I first fell in love with: Hermione Granger! 
  • Character I never expected to love as much as I do now: Snape. 
  • Character everyone loves but I don’t: Bellatrix? I don’t hate her though. 
  • Character I love but everyone else hates: Snape. Lol. Also Dumbledore. 
  • Character I used to love but don’t any longer:Hmmmm there’s not really anyone I fell out of love with.
  • Character I would kiss: Lupin. Except he’s Tonks’s. 
  • Character I want to slap (some sense into): Sirius Black. 
  • A pairing I love: Tonks/Lupin! 
  • A pairing I hate: Any teachers x students

About the X-men fallacy, have you ever seen it used Well? I’ve seen criticisms towards writers that fall into those tropes when writing characters that are oppressed in fantastical settings like Naruto and Lupin. It’s more murky with Eldians bc they do have the ability to turn into titans but they have to be forced to. Idk if ghouls are a good portrayal either bc kagunes would most likely exist in some form when ghouls eat Rc cells so ppl would have a reason I guess?

Well, I haven’t seen Naruto, but I have seen the fallacy discussed in relation to Lupin in Harry Potter (werewolf syndrome is pretty similar to HIV/AIDS in terms of how it’s stigmatized, but of course, HIV/AIDS is not actually that dangerous if you take proper precautions with bodily fluids, and it certainly doesn’t cause someone to lose themselves the way werewolves do. HIV/AIDS is an issue I care deeply about when it comes to reducing the stigma around it, because people I care about have it). In Lupin, ghouls, and Eldia, the fallacy presents itself in that all three of these do constitute some degree of a threat (actually, Eldia is the least threatening) whereas real world oppression does not constitute an actual threat besides people desperately clutching their power and security above common sense, decency, and empathy. 

(However, about Eldia, I’ll state that I think the best parallel to be made to the real world is to nuclear weapons, as that seems to be what titans stockpiled in the wall are supposed to represent. It’s almost as if mangas like SnK, TG, and HxH often discuss the concept of nuclear weapons and societal annihilation because, idk, Japan might have a better understanding of that than the rest of the world where certain leaders use nukes to threaten each other whenever they feel like it.)

I think the X-men fallacy is always going to be problematic, and but I also feel like every single story that has ever existed is problematic because the world is filled with different people who have different responses to different experiences. It really depends on what triggers you precisely. I get why people are triggered by certain fallacies and I do not fault them for that, but people have to understand that fiction is not a one-one equivalent for reality, and while you can draw parallels between, say, werewolf syndrome and HIV/AIDS, and between the Holocaust and Eldians, but you also need to understand that that is not necessarily intended to be exactly that. 

I also feel like people need to be able to critically read things. Take the good and leave the parts you don’t like, and acknowledge that nothing is perfect. Like for example, I personally think the armband thing was a bad idea in SnK. We got the point of what was going on in Marlay without that. If it’s too much for someone to handle, that’s fine, but it’s fine for others to enjoy it. 

Of course, I do feel like authors need to be responsible about how these things are handled. If SnK was heading towards a “destroy them they really are evil!” ending (which it is definitely not, even if I don’t expect the majority of our main cast to make it, I do expect freedom for Eldia in the end) that would be irresponsible, 100%. If Lupin ended up going berserk and killing people just because that would have been irresponsible, but his fears of himself were unfounded. 

If people are triggered by SnK or by HP or by X-men, they do not have to read it. Making posts telling others to stop reading it though based on personal feelings, cherry-picking, and saying SnK’s fascist when it’s clearly anti-fascist, is honestly offensive and trivializes something that should not be trivialized. 

Did you watch Fantastic Beast and where to find them? What did you think of it? And what did you think of the trailer for the Crimes of Grindelwald?

I have seen it! I liked it though it didn’t fully captivate me like the original HP novels. I will say that I am intrigued for where it’s going, and I’m sure it will shock absolutely no one to hear that my favourite character by far is Credence Barebone and he’s the character I’m most invested in. He has a ton of potential to develop and have a stunning arc, which better end in redemption or else what even were Harry Potter’s themes to begin with. 

I will also say that I think it’s interesting that Fantastic Beasts seems to have been written for the kids who grew up with the Harry Potter novels–like the novels slowly matured in theme as we grew (though okay I didn’t read them until I was older because #cult) and the movie felt like it was not a kid’s movie at all–it was for young adults who were scared of the changes in the world. The timing it came out was very fitting with the rise of fanaticism that we still see going on in the world today, and it seemed to offer hope in some very dark times. And for that reason, I liked it.

Credence needs to be saved though. 100%. 

About changing things in HP, I once read some long HP what-if post in tumblr about “what if Harry didn’t become Auror and instead teaching defense against the dark arts” and “what if the one who become Triwizard champion from Hogwarts is a Slytherin and how that would affect all the Slytherins, changing the course of the final battles againist Voldemort (Slytherins protecting Hogwarts and daring to stand up to their Death Eaters parents)”, and I kinda like them.

Oh those are really cool ideas!

What are some things you would change about Harry Potter, storywise? For me I wouldve loved more POVs (Can’t even start to say who I would want)& Harry to have tried to find out about his family. 1 thing that peeved me was how he never paid attention to History of Magic classes bc of it mustve covered the 1st Wizarding War & things that would fascinate him (Henry Potter, etc). Ik he needed to not know so he can learn about the world but it wouldve been cool if he knew stuff but not everything.

Oooooh. I can see what you mean! Hm. I would have included more obvious diversity, and the pacing of the camping saga in book 7 needed work.  

I will say I struggle to think critically about Harry Potter. It definitely has flaws and is not perfect but for me, Harry Potter is magical. I read it not as a kid because it was banned, but when I was an adult leaving the cult-like atmosphere I’d grown up in. Those books have a profound meaning for me as a result. They were healing to read, saved my faith (oh the irony), and since I first read them around Christmas, I always associate them with that holiday now. I think HP is somehow sacred to me.

You like Snape! I’ve liked him even since… Chamber of Secret I think? I was very young when I got to know the series from my cousin (I was still in grade school), and whenever I was asked about my favorite character I couldn’t answer because early Snape was mean and he’s much older compared to my cousin’s favorite Luna – I thought, “definitely not someone a grade schooler would like” lol. As I get older I’m not afraid to say I love him and he really is well written! One of my all time fav :)

Oh my gosh I forgot to put Luna on my list of faves! ADD LUNA. Lol. But yes, same. Snape is a bully, but he’s really complex and well written and for that, I love his character.